|
Obese
Population Vulnerable to Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
|
Certified for 0.25
Category 1 AMA Credit
Sponsored by the University
of Alabama School of Medicine
Division of Continuing Medical Education
| Release Date:
February 27, 2006 |
Expiration
Date: February 27, 2009
|
| TARGET
AUDIENCE: |
| Primary
care physicians |
| ABSTRACT: |
| Fatty liver
disease is a growing problem among increasingly obese Americans.
Weight loss slows or reverses the disease. |
| OBJECTIVES: |
| The reader
will appreciate the different etiologies for nonalcoholic
fatty liver disease and appropriate evaluations and interventions. |
| Top of Page |
| FACULTY: |
|
Gary
A. Abrams, MD
Associate Professor of Medicine
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama
|
| DISCLOSURE: |
|
In accordance with the Accreditation
Council for Continuing Medical Education Standards for
Commercial Support, the faculty does not have any financial
affiliations to disclose.
|
| CME
PARTICIPATION: |
| To participate
in this program for CME credit, please review the objectives
before beginning the program. Complete the course and the
self-assessment test before February 27, 2009 to receive
CME credit. Your certificate will then be available online.
This process should take approximately 15 minutes. |
| ACCREDITATION: |
|
The University of Alabama School
of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council
for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing
medical education for physicians.
The University of Alabama School
of Medicine designates this educational activity for a
maximum of 0.25 Category 1 credit toward the AMA Physician's
Recognition Award. Physicians should only claim credit
commensurate with the extent of their participation in
the activity.
The boards of nursing in many
states, including Alabama, recognize Category 1 continuing
medical education courses as acceptable activities for
the renewal of license to practice nursing.
|
| Top of Page |
| Introduction: |
Nonalcoholic
fatty liver disease (NAFLD) describes a spectrum of chronic
conditions characterized by a pattern of liver injury
that includes macrovesicular steatosis, hepatocellular
ballooning degeneration, hepatocyte necrosis, and fibrosis.
The liver lesions of NAFLD are similar to those of alcoholic
liver disease, but occur in individuals who consume little
or no alcohol. NAFLD’s histologic continuum includes
fatty liver disease alone and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
(NASH), a more aggressive form of disease that in some
individuals can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular
carcinoma.
|
|
| NAFLD
is now recognized as the most common form of liver injury,
UAB hepatologist Gary A. Abrams, MD, says. “In the
last decade, prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
has significantly increased along with rising numbers of
Americans affected by obesity and diabetes — both
strong independent risk factors for NAFLD. Most patients
are asymptomatic, but estimates indicate about 20% of the
US population have fatty liver disease and 2.5% to 5% have
NASH.”
An important study reports within 10 years of diagnosis,
3% of patients with fatty liver disease progress to cirrhosis.
In comparison, progression is more common in individuals
with NASH; during a 5- to 10-year period, between 30% and
40% of patients with NASH develop cirrhosis (Gastroenterology.
1999;116:1413-1419).
|
|
Histologic
Features and Diagnosis
|
|
Ballooning
hepatocytes in zone 3 of the liver or pericellular or perivenular
fibrosis distinguish NASH from fatty liver disease alone,
Abrams says. Some patients have atypical features, primarily
portal fibrosis and fatty liver without liver cell injury.
A recent publication attempts to standardize histologic
diagnostic criteria for NASH that include grades of steatosis,
lobular inflammation, ballooning, and stages of fibrosis (Hepatology.
2005;41:1313-1321).
“NAFLD
is the primary cause of elevated liver function tests found
during routine laboratory analysis,” Abrams says. “Once
other common causes of liver enzyme elevation — hepatitis
A, B, and C, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, autoimmune
processes, and iron overload — are excluded, clinicians
should order an ultrasound to check for hepatic fat infiltration.
CT scans and MRI also detect fat, but ultrasound is more
sensitive and less expensive.”
Ultrasound
is the most sensitive imaging test for fatty liver, but
30% fatty infiltration must occur for detection. “Normal
hepatic fat levels range up to 5%,” he says. “Therefore,
some patients with fat levels between 5% and 30% will have
normal ultrasounds, yet have fatty liver disease.”
To diagnose
NAFLD, clinicians must also rule out excessive alcohol
consumption. Cutoffs for damaging levels of alcohol consumption
vary, but the American Gastroenterological Association
(AGA) reports a fatty liver rarely develops when consumption
is <20 g/day.
These
criteria allow clinicians to diagnose NAFLD, but fatty
liver disease alone cannot be distinguished from NASH without
a liver biopsy, Abrams says. “There are no noninvasive
tests that accurately diagnose NASH, and experts disagree
about the value of liver biopsies. Some argue for always
performing a biopsy in order to adequately counsel patients
on prognosis and consideration for clinical trials. Others
counter that therapy for fatty liver disease and NASH are
identical and liver biopsies have risks and exhibit sampling
variability that limit utility.”
In a
recent study, investigators collected paired liver biopsy
specimens from 51 patients with NAFLD. The authors report
steatosis grade was the only feature showing substantial
agreement among specimens, whereas ballooning degeneration,
a key diagnostic criteria for NASH, would have been missed
in 25% of patients if only one biopsy had been performed
(Gastroenterology. 2005;128[7]:1898-1906).
“I
do not use liver biopsies to prognosticate,” Abrams
says. “I tell patients they have fatty liver disease,
they may have NASH, they could progress to end-stage liver
disease, and explain weight loss is the only currently
successful therapy for both fatty liver disease and NASH.”
|
| Top of Page |
| Damaging
Triad |
|
Fatty
liver disease and NASH can occur in individuals of all
ages, including
children. AGA’s review notes that
studies published before 1999 suggested NAFLD was more common
among women, but later investigations support equal frequency
in men (Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1705-1725). “Obesity
is the most common risk factor for NAFLD,” Abrams says. “In
a UAB study of 195 bariatric surgery patients, liver biopsies
taken at the time of surgery found 90% of patients had fatty
liver disease and 36% had NASH,” he says. “In
a recent study conducted exclusively in type 2 diabetics,
ultrasound revealed 50% had fat in their liver. Diabetics
also are more likely to progress to NASH,” he says. “An
autopsy study found individuals with diabetes had a 7% higher
incidence of NASH than nondiabetics.” The metabolic
syndrome — the clustering of central adiposity, dyslipidemia,
hypertension, and glucose intolerance as manifested by insulin
resistance — is also commonly associated with NAFLD.
AGA reports other factors that increase risk for fatty liver
disease and NASH include several rare disorders of lipid
metabolism (abetalipoproteinemia); rare syndromes characterized
by severe insulin resistance (lipoatrophic diabetes and Mauriac
syndrome); Weber-Christian syndrome; certain medications
(diltiazem, amiodarone, tamoxifen); and treatment with highly
active antiretroviral therapy.
|
| Top of Page |
| Halting
Progression, Healing Injury |
|
Progression
from fatty liver disease to NASH is not well understood.
Abrams is principal investigator
for a study
that seeks to define the mechanisms through which individuals
develop NASH. “Hepatocellular injury caused by oxidative
stress may involve post-translational modification of proteins,
particularly those in mitochondria,” he says. “Using
a clinical repository of liver tissue from patients with
both fatty liver disease alone and NASH, our research team
is isolating hepatic mitochondria and performing proteomic
analysis to tease out factors that promote disease progression.”
Abrams emphasizes primary care physicians should have a
high suspicion of NAFLD in patients who are obese, diabetic,
or dyslipidemic and perform an ultrasound to check for hepatic
fat. Routine liver blood tests are not useful in identifying
patients with NAFLD, he says.
“Although we do not know why some patients progress
to NASH, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, we do know
weight loss and resultant glucose normalization slow disease
progression and heal liver injury. Even patients who have
already advanced to cirrhosis may experience some resolution
of fibrosis,” Abrams says. “If patients understand
they have a chronic condition that could progress to end-stage
liver disease, they may have additional motivation to normalize
their weight.”
|
| Top of Page |
| Self-Assessment
Test: |
| To
apply for 0.25 Category 1 credit, complete the self-assessment
test and you should receive an online certificate immediately. |
|
To
take the test click
here!
|
|